Sunday, March 11, 2012

Responsibility

That may have been the most beautiful blog post I’ve ever read. It makes me want to be a father… and write a blog post (about how I want to be a father, but lack the emotional maturity).

My friend, who is a lady, was exhorting me to get to know and consider pursuing a certain girl. Apparently this girl is really seeking Jesus and has a bunch of good qualities or something. I found myself very turned off. I've been saying that I’m having a “rebellious” phase lately, so maybe I’m not looking for someone like that. I really don’t want to talk about her faith or my walk with the Lord or what God has been up to lately.

I’ve gone to a couple bars this last week and I think I might try to do that more often. Actually, that just gave me an idea for what to do tonight. I like going out with friends, but there’s something nice about going out by myself. More specifically, I like chilling with strangers. They don’t even need to be ladies. Just a week ago I went to this shity, tiny bar on a Sunday night and chatted it up with this middle-aged dude about Bible college, his divorce, Pink Floyd, and whatever else. It was great. It did give me a picture of the less attractive side of family life. I’m really stoked on the idea of marriage and fatherhood, but this dude’s situation gave me a bit of a scare. At least he still gets to see his kids.

Here’s one that will make my sister proud: I’ve been thinking lately that I might become Mennonite. I really don’t think I’m trying to copy her; I guess we just have similar genes and have been exposed to enough of the same environmental influences (nature and nurture). But seriously, I really like what those Mennonites do. I think I might become Mennonite and get into a career with the Mennonite Central Committee, which sounds like the best Christian development agency out there. Those thoughts are still in the early stages though…

I read a 170 page book today! I didn’t like it very much, but it was a course text so I decided I would read it really fast and get it out of the way. It was about leadership, which is something I’m currently trying to get away from as much as possible. In hind-sight it wasn’t too bad, but I’m still glad I sped-read it. Now I can spend more time on the class I’m actually interested in: “Lifespan Development.” I get to do this project where I hang out with a baby for awhile and compare my primary research with the literature I review, and then give a comprehensive presentation on it all. I’m stoked for it. Babies rock! If you ever need a baby-sitter, I’m your man.

Oh man, during my team’s practicum in Guatemala I definitely hung out with the little kids from the church way more than the youth or young adults. They’re so much cooler. Oh, but I hated that practicum. I’m so tired of being a leader. I hate having responsibility.

Did you know that I am in the same life-stage as a 39 year-old? Basically what I’m getting at is that it’s time to make babies happen. Of course, fatherhood doesn’t jive real well with running away from responsibility. Maybe I just want to be an uncle. Maybe I just need to go spend a year in Africa.

­

I just deleted a paragraph that I wrote that was particularly angsty and introspective. I’m trying to get better at writing decent posts and not just vomiting my un-edited thoughts onto the internet (or would it be ‘into’ the internet?).



Monday, February 6, 2012

Liturgy: A Response To "Prayer Of Sorts"

I was inspired to blog.
I guess when our lives are stable and relatively free of conflict, drama, pain, excitement, or anything which would require our complete attention, we start to get philosophical. I just haven't been able to keep on lately. Or, at least, I haven't wanted to. I really don't care to. I was walking down the path of instant-gratification (and would still be on it if not for the blessing of a restrictive context). I saw that my values were starting to slip away one by one. Maybe this season is know as autumn. I feel like I'm falling. Shedding layers of hard sugar to remember the chewy goodness, perhaps? More licks than I can count, though. Too much coffee and not enough beer. More conversations that I'll never have. That's not a new one; the only difference is this time I could give a shit. She'll learn how to be a leader without my help. They'll get over their irrational fears of the dark without my words of comfort. At the same time, what else do I have to do right now? Running away wouldn't get me anywhere fancy, not to mention I can't afford it. If I continue to serve simply because it's all I really know how to do is it still service?
I must get back to my lolly-pop metaphor because I'm quite excited about it. My source of inspiration has dropped all his nuts and is holding tightly to one of the smallest seeds in the world (that was intended to be vaguely vulgar, but not because it helps communicate anything important). The windstorm blew his house away so he's taking refuge in the cellar. I hope he finds it to be a place of beauty and warmth, even if he does miss all of his stuff for the first while. The simplicity will likely bring a new level of peace to his overactive imagination. When I was a kid I lived in a big beautiful house, but I'll never forget how much fun it was to turn small abandoned closets into private getaways. You really don't need much after all. We often forget, but... we really don't need much.


Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Guatemala

This isn't the first time I've been here, but it may be the last.
I'm half-way through my third week of my 3rd 2-month long trip to Guatemala and things are going quite well. Spanish is coming along quite nicely, I'm on top of my work, and my skin is starting to return to a more normal color (after being in Alberta for 5 months).
So far I've: Drank a lot of coffee, climbed part of a mountain to stand under a waterfall, taught a theology lesson, written a short sermon in Spanish, talked a lot about politics, economics, and the news in Spanish, done a high ropes course, had terrible allergies most every day, read part of psychology text-book (in english), met with two different pastors to see if my team can partner with their churches at different times to learn about inter-cultural ministry and leadership, eaten cow tongue and blood sausage, had some nasty diarrhea, walked a lot, checked out a lot of cute girls, wanted to get drunk, slept really hard, avoided responsibility, felt apathetic towards a lot of things, spent more money than I usually do, and made this short video for the people back at school:

Ignore the 3 or so minutes of black after the video ends.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Global Economic Justice as Mission: An Analysis of Economic Globalization

The world we live in is broken. Even in the most affluent nations there are many people who are hungry, cold, sick, oppressed, and poor. Today there are over 27 million people who are enslaved, being exploited for economic gain and controlled by violence.[1] Five million children under the age of five die every year from malnutrition.[2] There are over 30 million people today living with HIV/Aids.[3] But amidst all the chaos there are those who believe in the coming of the kingdom of God which will be peace on earth and good will towards human-kind. As servants of the Lord it is our duty to do all we can to proclaim the good news of the kingdom in sign, word, and deed. While this mission is simple, it also plays out in a wide variety of areas. There is one area in particular which has significant influence on the issues mentioned, and many more; that is the topic of economic globalization. It is the author’s intent to describe in this essay this current trend, the theological rational for a Christian response, and some suggestions which will move the Church towards action. The first question to ask is: What is the problem?

Toward an Understanding of Economic Globalization:

The term globalization is used flippantly and can mean a variety of things. The fact that one can go to a city in the US and find entire neighborhoods of people from other countries, the ease of communicating or traveling to all parts of the globe, or the presence of McDonalds and other “western” companies on every continent. This discussion will look more specifically at the systems in place which allow business and trade to happen between countries all over the world, or economic globalization. It should be noted that it is not particularly new for trade to happen from one part of the globe to another. The current trend we are experiencing does, however, seem to have unique attributes and requires new analyses.[4]

The ideology of Neoliberalism, in regards to market philosophy, is the first key facet to understanding economic globalization. In an essay by Ton Veerkamp entitled “Neoliberalism and Reclaiming a Theology of Economy,” this ideology is defined by low taxes, and minimal regulation of labor, finance and capital markets. It is the idea of a free-market economy in which there is little to no restrictions in the realm of business and transaction.[5] Before neoliberalism there was classical liberal economics in which the government was to protect private-property and allow for competitive market. However, through tensions and struggles in the form of labor movements, governments set regulations on markets and initiated welfare programs for the poor. Neoliberalism, then, began in the 1980’s by seeking to remove state welfare. It sees increased return and profit for those in charge of production to be the purpose of the economy.[6]

Neoliberalism relies heavily on the philosophy of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the idea that what is considered right or wrong is determined by the extent that it increases happiness and/or decreases unhappiness. On a basic level this isn’t entirely bad, but the way it is used by neoliberals is very individualistic. The “social” aspect of things is ignored and the individual is the sole determining factor for making decisions. Individualism, which is at the root of both utilitarianism and neoliberalism, is a belief which is deeply rooted in the western worldview and has implications on all aspects of society. Ultimatly, Veerkamp sums up the situation by saying, “The capitalist economies of the last two centuries reduced the pursuit of happiness to the pursuit of increasing individual (private) property.”[7]

Neoliberal/free-market theory stands in opposition to Marxist/communist ideas of society. Instead of the power being given to the working class people it is in the hands of the bourgeois, a ruling class of the rich and influential. The free-market philosophy defends itself with the idea of the “trickle-down effect.” If there is sufficient investment into the private-sector then everyone else in the economy will benefit. There is an egregious lack of evidence that this logic works at all. Moiseraele Prince Dibeela claims that large slum communities, which have been formed in large cities all over the world by people looking for jobs, are “the main effect of global capitalism on our planet today.”[8]

Free-market philosophy is considered by many to be the key to eliminating poverty in the world. Organizations like the IMF and the World Bank have promoted it and often imposed aspects of it on developing nations. Moiseraele points out the irony that this ideology is held so strongly as the only viable option by people from a part of the world which is obsessed with values of liberty and free thought. The free-market is thought to make an equal playing field where anyone can trade with whom they wish. Realistically, this just allows those who already have advantages, such as capital and technology, to dominate and exploit those who do not. As a result of this unjust system the poor have at times risen up to fight for their economic liberty. This happened in South Africa in 2008 when impoverished locals rioted and violently attacked foreigners who they felt were coming to steal their jobs and livelihoods. This is another devastating effect of the current global economic situation which will continue to occur if nothing is done.[9] Before moving to action, however, we must ask: What does God think?

Theological Reflection on Economic Globalization:

In light of this current reality, Christians need to be thinking critically about how to respond. What is the relationship between theology and economics? What does the Bible say about the poor and oppressed? What does it say about how we should use our money? Is our involvement limited to the immediate issues we see around us, or are we called to move to change the overarching systems which cause those issues? Here I will outline a few points from the heart of Christianity which will move us to an understanding of the role of the Christian in this present crisis.

Christianity stands in opposition to the philosophy of individualism, which the neoliberal ideology is built on. In John 17 Jesus prays that His followers may be one just as He and the Father are one. He also speaks of the relationship He has with the Father and prays that we may be brought into that relationship. It is from the unity of believers together in communion with the Godhead that “the world may believe…” (John 17:21). So the idea of being in interdependent relationship with other Christians and utterly dependent on God isn’t just for our own sake, but for the sake of our proclamation of the good news as well. Jesus also said a lot about what it looks like to follow Him. "If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me” (Mark 8:33-35). He said that the greatest commandment was to Love God with all your heart, mind, and soul; and to love your neighbor as yourself (Mark 12:30-31). These and many other Scriptures make it very difficult to see how a Christian could justify holding to the philosophy of individualism, or any ideology which is based on it.

It has been suggested that economic globalization has become an idol. The belief that it is the source of global economic salvation clearly dethrones Christ as the true savior and redeemer of the world.[10] Many also claim that economic globalization demands the allegiance of all for it to work properly. They have deep faith and believe that were free-market economy to be given complete reign it would naturally do what is best for human-kind.[11] According to Scripture, only God is sovereign and only God is to be trusted. The first commandment is, “You shall have no other gods before me” (Exodus 20:3). Mathew 6:24 tells us, “You cannot serve both God and money.” Reliance on a man-made system, or fear of man, “will prove to be a snare, but whoever trusts in the LORD is kept safe.” (Proverbs 29:25).

There is a huge theme of justice for the poor and oppressed in the Bible. Jesus tells us of the day of judgment when the King will separate the sheep from the goats (Matthew 25:31-46). He invites the sheep into the kingdom because they fed the hungry, gave drink to the thirsty, invited in the strangers, clothed the naked, cared for the sick, and visited the prisoners. The goats, on the other hand, are sent to the eternal fire for simply not doing those things. In Luke 4:18-19 Jesus quotes Isaiah to introduce Himself and His mission as directly linked with the oppressed, the sick, and the poor.[12] The psalms speak of God as one who “raises the poor from the dust, and lifts the needy from the ash heap, to make them sit with princes” (Psalms 113:6-7). In one of his letters John asks, “How does God’s love abide in anyone who has the world’s goods and sees a brother or sister in need and yet refuses help?” (1 John 3:17). Scripture is clear that God is against poverty and oppression and it is our responsibility to work towards a world in which there is no more.[13]

In 2004 the World Alliance of Reformed Churches met in Ghana, Africa, and drew up a document called the Accra Confession. In it they describe the current situation of economic globalization as the root of a crisis of poverty and inequality around the world.[14] They go on to list out their confessions of theological convictions which require them to reject the situation and work towards a better world. They believe that God is sovereign creator and sustainer who invites us into partnership with God to create and redeem. As a response they reject the global economic situation which excludes the poor and others “from the fullness of life.” They also reject that which would deny God’s sovereignty, such as “economic, political, and military empire…” God’s covenant with creation, which is of justice, peace, and grace, blesses and includes all of creation. Therefore they reject the “competitive greed and selfishness” in the form of the neoliberal market system, or in the form of other systems that claim to be the only way. God calls us to fight injustice (Micah 6:8; Amos 5:24). The idea that the poor only have themselves to blame and that wealth is a sign of the blessing of God is subsequently rejected.[15] The document ends with a series of calls and admonitions for Churches to work for justice.[16]

Ton Veerkamp writes about the 10th commandment, “Do not covet...” (Exodus 20:17). He argues that here, and in Isaiah 5:8, God is condemning the process of accumulation of economic resources. Were a few families to accumulate too much of the basic resources the result would be the majority of society becoming slaves to the king and social elite. This is what happened in the other societies in the ancient East. Israel was tempted to become like the other nations around them, but God clearly had a plan for them to be set apart. Central to this plan was the prohibition of accumulation and slavery.[17]

Matthew’s Gospel, according to Lidija Novakovic, contributes to the discussion of the issue of economic globalization in a unique way. In Matthew 5:38-42, Jesus brings up the lex talionis and adds to it with the admonition to turn the other cheek, along with others. Many scholars see this as supporting the idea of passivism; that the person being oppressed should simply endure the injustice. Novakovic argues that the victims in these illustrations are actively responding “by offering to endure more wrongs.” In that culture the appropriate response would be doing nothing and being submissive. Turning the other cheek, however, shows that the victim still has his dignity and it forces the other to react, thus taking away the perpetrators power in the situation. Therefore, this passage challenges unequal distribution of power and encourages victims to actively protest injustice that it may be exposed.[18]

Novakovic also goes into the story of Jesus with the Samaritan woman (Matt. 15:21–28), the parable of the wedding feast (22:1–14), and the parable of the judgment of the nations (25:31–46). All of the passages criticize power being unequally distributed and promote a just community. Matthew 15:21-28 gives the hope of equality in God’s grace for those who are normally excluded. Matthew 22:1-14 invites everyone into the kingdom and doesn’t base it on religious or social status. Matthew 25:31-46 addresses those who are economically privileged and calls them to serve the least of these, being aware of their needs, as though they were doing it to Jesus Himself.[19] Novakovic concludes by saying, “Matthew’s dynamic message of encouragement and accountability offers valuable resources to Christian communities that might be discouraged by the complexities of economic globalization.”[20] This leads us to the final question this essay will address: What then shall we do?

Toward a Christian response to Economic Globalization:

This issue is large and complex. It would be easy for the Church to give in to despair, but this must not happen. Church leadership and lay people in all different walks of life have unique contributions to make in this battle. Ultimately, it is our duty to do what we can, even if it seems impossible, and if God wants us to succeed then what can stop us?

The first step to responding is being aware of what it means to be part of the communion of saints. To be in communion with others near and far will enable us to see things from a broader perspective. When I am aware that my brothers and sisters are suffering due to injustice stemming from economic globalization I will be moved to act on their behalf. The focus is on doing good to those in the communion around the world and not doing harm.[21] Remembering the brief explanation of the trinity above, communion is God’s starting point for creation and action in the world. By being in relationship with one another we imitate that aspect of God and productivity is the unavoidable result. As the Accra confession states, we must “reject any attempt in the life of the church to separate justice and unity.”[22]

From the Church in communion will flow the duties of diokonia and kerygma. The churches redemptive action and prophetic speech are essential to addressing the system of economic globalization.[23] Good development must take place in the many specific regions which are most affected. The education and resources of the church in affluent nations needs to be used wisely. The Lutheran World Council calls this being responsible.[24] Also, the church must critique society loudly, making sure that all hear and are held accountable, especially those who hold the reigns of the economic system. A more practical term for this is advocacy. The LWF has encouraged the IMF and World Band to be more transparent with their practices, promoted just trade policies among countries, and boycotted organizations which are known to be destructive.[25] This proclamation needs to be directed as much to the church itself as to those outside. There are far too many who are completely unaware of what is going on in our world today, and they must be informed. Those who are already aware can continue to become educated, exploring the topic from various points of view, and taking a multi-disciplinary approach.

The parts of the Church that are experiencing the oppression of economic injustice should expose their perpetrators for what is being done. This idea is going back to Novakovic’s interpretation of the book of Matthew. The poor do not have to accept their circumstances passively; rather, they must be active and “turn the other cheek,” maintaining their dignity and pushing their oppressors to either stop, or amplify their attack and be exposed for what they really are. The question of what this means for each different situation is one that must be asked by those close by with much prayer and consideration of Biblical truth.

This leads me to my last and most important point of action, prayer. The church needs to be on her knees constantly in light of the severity of this situation. We must repent of allowing our society to influence our understanding of economics so inappropriately and for letting the problem get this far. Then we must turn the situation up to the one who is sovereign and just; the God who lifts the poor up from the dust and brings princes low; who hates injustice and loves mercy. These prayers not only cause God to act, they also remind us that God is the higher power and forces us to lay down the idols we had deemed more powerful. Prayer is a discipline which deepens our convictions, connects us with the source of life, and unites us as a body, all of which will empower and equip us to act.

The world we live in is broken. The neoliberal economic globalization which has been occurring is one of the main contributing factors for the major problems around the planet. It operates on a basis of individualism and greed and uses faulty logic and false pretense to justify itself. Scripture and theology tell us that God is against this system on a variety of levels. As Christians we must respond. God has given us tools to use and we must not be discouraged for God has overcome the world. Lord, have mercy.



[1] Kevin Bales, Disposable people, (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2000) 8.

[2] World Food Programme, “Hunger Stats,” wfp.org, 2011

http://www.wfp.org/hunger/stats (accessed Dec. 16, 2011).

[3] Avert, “Global HIV and Aids estimates, End of 2009”

http://www.avert.org/worldstats.htm (accessed Dec. 16, 2011).

[4] Brent P. Waters, "Two, or perhaps two and a half cheers for globalization." Anglican Theological Review 92, no. 4 (2010): 707. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost (accessed December 15, 2011).

[5] Ton, Veerkamp, "NEOLIBERALISM AND RECLAIMING A THEOLOGY OF ECONOMY." International Review Of Mission 97, no. 386/387 (July 2008): 199. MasterFILE Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed December 17, 2011).

[6] World Alliance of Reformed Churches, “Covenanting for Justice in the Economy and the Earth,” pg. 12

http://warc.jalb.de/warcajsp/news_file/The_Accra_Confession_English.pdf (accessed Dec. 15, 2011).

[7] Veerkamp, 198-201

[8] Moiseraele Prince Dibeela, "CONVERSION, EVANGELISM AND MARKET."International Review Of Mission 97, no. 386/387 (July 2008): 189-190, MasterFILE Premier, EBSCOhost (accessed December 17, 2011).

[9] Moiseraele, 189-191

[10] Moiseraele, 190

[11] Karen L. Bloomquist, “Engaging Economic Globalization as Communion,” (Geneva: Lutheran World Federation, 2001). http://www.lutheranworld.org/What_We_Do/DTS/DTS-Documents/EN/Globalization-EN.pdf (accessed Dec. 16, 2011).

[12] Paul S. Chung, "Engaging God's Mission and Diakonia in Life of Public Spheres: Justification and Economic Justice." Dialog: A Journal Of Theology 49, no. 2 (Summer2010): 143. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed December 17, 2011).

[13] Kenneth R. Ross, "Christian Mission and the End of Poverty: Time for Eschatology," Mission Studies: Journal Of The International Association For Mission Studies 24, no. 1 (April 2007): 85-86. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed December 17, 2011).

[14] World, 1-2

[15] Ibid, 3

[16] Ibid, 4

[17] Veerkamp, 205-206

[18] Lidija Novakovic, "'YET EVEN THE DOGS EAT THE CRUMBS THAT FALL FROM THEIR MASTERS' TABLE': MATTHEW'S GOSPEL AND ECONOMIC GLOBALISATION." Hervormde Teologiese Studies 65, no. 1 (December 2009): 2-3. Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed December 17, 2011).

[19] Novakovic, 5

[20] Ibid, 7

[21] The Lutheran World Federation, “A CALL TO PARTICIPATE IN TRANSFORMING ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION.” (Winnipeg, LWF Tenth Assembly, 2003) 7, http://www.lutheranworld.org/What_We_Do/DTS/DTS-Documents/EN/Call-Globalization_EN.pdf (Accessed Dec. 14, 2011).

[22] World, 4

[23] Veerkamp, 208

[24] Lutheran, 7

[25] Bloomquest, 20-22

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Individualism and Worship

Here's an Essay I wrote for my Theology of Worship class:

There has always been a tension between Christianity and Culture. What does it mean to be of another world, but live in this one? Jesus was 100% a first century Jew, but He also said and did a lot of things which were very counter-cultural. Today, the corporate worship gathering of the Church is an area where this challenge of Christianity and culture shows up most vividly. The services may only be once a week, but they reflect what is going on within the heart of the Church. In addition to being shaped by what people already believe, corporate worship plays a significant role in shaping the beliefs of the congregants. The term individualism has been used to describe a societal philosophy which is prevalent in North America. This individualistic mindset is showing up in the North American Church and her corporate worship gatherings and it needs to be removed by intentional re-shaping of church liturgy.

“The national characteristic of American culture is one of individualism.”[1] This characteristic can be traced back to the very origins of the American project. Many of the early settlers were leaving their homelands to carve out their own future in the new world. Robert Bellah writes about a few different exemplary figures from the early days in America. Thomas Jefferson, one of the key members in producing the Declaration of Independence, was a large advocate of freedom from having the state interfere unnecessarily with people’s lives.[2] Both the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights reveal an emphasis on the importance of individual liberty. Moving ahead in history, Bellah tells of Alexis de Tocqueville, a Frenchman and an early interpreter of American culture. Tocqueville, writing in the mid-19th century, said that the idea of “individualism” was new, but it had many similarities to “egoism” which was more appropriate to describe the founding fathers. He described individualism as allowing citizens to withdraw and shape their communities to their tastes, leaving the greater community to take care of itself.[3]

Laura Mirakian writes about two changes in America that have helped elevated the value of ‘Self.’ The first is that church and family have been deconstructed, or stripped of their authority. People don’t have the same kind of communities to direct them as they used to. The authority has been transferred to the Self. Now I get to chose what is good and what is worth my time. Not only that, but there is “no commitment or consistency necessary.” The second change is the rise of modern therapeutic culture. A huge movement in modern therapy suggests that self-actualization is the key to healing. The whole concept of Self-Help books seem like a prime example of this. The movement of ‘Positive Thinking’ is another. These movements have made a way for a radical level of self-worship where I am both lord and savior of myself. This elevation of Self essentially divides people from any tradition, religion, custom, history, culture, or anything which would give external definition.[4] It has also contributed significantly to the post-modern conclusion that truth is subjective.

Individualism can be seen as having two different streams. There is what we might call utilitarian individualism where the self will use whatever means necessary to seek whatever goal, doing so independently of external influences. More prevalent, however, is expressive individualism, which has more to do with each person’s individuality being brought out by the expression of their unique essence. The expressive individual must find their own way of meeting their needs and finding significance and definition. The result is that people form groups or enclaves around certain interests or commonalities. This type of congregation is sharply distinct from the concept of community which includes and unifies people of whatever lifestyle in light of something greater than those individuals and their personal wants.[5]

Individualism has significant implications for all arenas of society, and for the purposes of this essay I will look at how it affects the religious realm focusing specifically on the evangelical Christian Church. A poll in 1978 showed that 80 percent of Americans felt that individuals should decide for themselves, without church communities deciding for them, what sort of religious beliefs they will hold to. Along with that, many view their personal relationships with God as something that transcends their being involved in a religious community. There are those who still value being part of a congregation, but the reasoning has more to do with their individual choice to commit because of the good moral things the church does, or the sense of community they get.[6] While that view may be more common in more theologically liberal churches, individualism has taken a different form in some conservative churches. Bellah describes one such example of a church which holds firmly to many doctrinal statements and whose congregants get a lot of their definition from the community. In spite of this, however, many of the sermons given are significantly influenced by humanistic psychology and present God as a cure to insecurity and a source of self-worth. The application of the Biblical morals and values they hold to lacks breadth and mostly only applies to personal relationships. “Outside this sphere of personal morality, the evangelical church has little to say about wider social commitments.”[7]

One characteristic of many evangelical groups which runs very deep in American history is the concept of a personal experience of salvation. There were, and probably still are, churches which require testimonies of this sort of experience for an individual to become a member of the church. Using similar logic, many people see their day-to-day spiritual lives as being primarily personal. They have their own favorite place to pray and find those times alone with God to be the meat of their relationship with Him.[8] Many influential figures in American history have expressed an attitude of personal religion. “Thomas Jefferson said, ‘I am a sect myself,’ and Thomas Paine, ‘My mind is my church.’”[9] It is common for people with an individualistic view of religion to be critical of organized religious groups. They say that said groups are hypocritical, not living out what they say they believe.[10] The emphasis on a personal relationship with God over and above being part of any organized religion is one of the common threads of evangelicalism. A youth pastor of mine used to say that he hated religion, as a way of emphasizing this perspective which he saw as a crucial distinction from Catholics and other “traditional” Christians. He felt that they were bound by rules and formalities which didn’t leave any room for Jesus or genuine faith.

Individualism and its partner in crime “consumerism” have had a distinct impact on the structure of many evangelical corporate gatherings. The most popular service structures are comprised of two main experiences. The first is a drawn out series of worship songs. These are usually performed by a band and are essentially worship concerts which the congregants participate in by following the words projected on the screen up front. Stage lights, professional sound and musical arrangements, and performer stage presences all contribute to the concert experience. The second portion of the service is a sermon. The preacher uses varying amounts of Scripture and makes sure that the message is clear, interesting, and practical. The service is essentially formatted to be as appealing to as many people as possible. This base motivation is what makes this structure individualistic. The aspects of being entertaining yet meaningful and fulfilling are thought to be essential to ensuring that people will continue to attend.[11]

In “The Divine Commodity,” Skye Jethani writes about a Church in California which has developed a video service experience. The idea, inspired by the shopping mall, is that people can show up on Sunday and chose what kind of venue they’d like to participate in. Those who enjoy traditional hymns and those who prefer contemporary rock music no longer have to tolerate the other. There are currently eighteen different services offered, distinguished either by time, location, or style. The pastor is admittedly appealing to a consumer mindset as a means of drawing in more people. He believes in honoring people’s differences and not forcing them to conform to one standard of corporate worship.[12] This creates homogenous groups, which I imagine are what Bellah would call “lifestyle enclaves” and not true communities.

As I’ve reflected on my own experience being raised in a charismatic evangelical church, I have also noticed aspects of individualism in the way the corporate worship was conducted. Most services I’ve been to have had seating arrangements of straight rows all facing the front. This physical structure implies that the congregants attention should be directed to the front and not to those around them. It is very reminiscent of most lecture halls and classrooms I’ve been in. I also remember that while singing songs at church camp we were often encouraged to focus on Jesus and forget about the many other people around us. The intent was to help us feel free to express our worship however we needed without being worried about how others would perceive us. I reminded myself of this principle for years whenever I had trouble focusing on God or felt afraid to raise my hands or dance about.

There is a famous worship song which I’ve heard used in many different church congregations, called “Only You” by the David Crowder Band. The lyrics are:

Take my heart, I Lay it down at the feet of you whose crowned // Take my life, I’m letting go. I lift it up to You who’s throned. /// And I will worship You, Lord. Only You, Lord // And I will bow down before You. Only You Lord /// Take my fret, take my fear. All I have, I’m leaving here // Be all my hopes, be all my dreams. You're my delights, be my everything /// And It’s just you and me here now. Only you and me here now. /// You should see the view. When it’s only You.”[13]

At first glance the song is very focused on God. The general premise is monotheistic worship. But at closer examination we see that the subject of a significant portion of the lyrics is the person singing: “I lift,” “I will worship,” “I will bow.” The more significant thing, however, is a line towards the end, “It’s just you and me here now…” Here the song is not just omitting any sort of acknowledgment of there being a congregation, it is actually emphasizing and praising the idea of singing to God apart from the community. I’m not making any qualitative judgments here; rather my intent is simply to point out the prevalence of individualistic emphases.

There is another, more subtle way in which individualism shows up in our popular worship songs. Robin Parry, in his book Worshiping Trinity, examines 362 worship songs put out by Vineyard, a movement and organization which seeks to promote intimate worship with God. Parry looked at what kind of title the songs used for God and found that 51.1 percent of them used an ambiguous “You Lord” kind of title, not mentioning any member of the trinity. 38.7 percent of the songs addressed one member of the trinity, the vast majority of which were focused specifically on Jesus. This analysis shows that the Trinitarian nature of God is largely unrecognized in these popular worship songs. The reason this demonstrates how individualism has affected our worship is because the doctrine of the Trinity is all about communalism. It not only tells us that God is plural, but it implies that we, as image-bearers, reflect core aspects of God as we interact with and relate to other people. Trinitarian worship completely strips the glory from the concept of the independent individual, and our worship songs show that we aren’t exactly comfortable with that.[14]

As we continue to look at contemporary worship music and practices we see that the therapeutic culture that Mirikiam mentions shows up there as well. American culture doesn’t value close family relationships the same way many other cultures do. As a result many people have significant emotional needs that aren’t being met. It’s been suggested that churches and other such groups are often used as imitation families by people who are seeking to fill those emotional needs. It is therefore easy to see that much of the Church’s worship is also shaped around meeting those same types of needs. There is such a strong focus on intimacy with God in contemporary worship songs. Take Hillsong’s “I want to know you”:

“In the secret, in the quiet place // In the stillness you are there // In the secret, in the quiet hour // I wait only for you // Cause, I want to know you more // I want to know you // I want to hear your voice // I want to know you more // I want to touch you // I want to see your face // I want to know you more.”[15]

This song tells us a lot about the emotional needs of those singing it, but little to nothing about God. Intimacy with God isn’t a bad thing, but there has to be other ways of meeting that need than just extended worship experiences with self-absorbed songs focusing on our emotional state.

So we’ve seen that individualism is a core aspect of the culture we live in and it has found its way into our Christian lives and corporate worship. The question we must now address is: what’s wrong with that? Has the evangelical church conformed to the patterns of the world? Or could it be that she is simply practicing good contextualization by becoming truly incarnate in American culture? To begin to answer these questions we will look to Scripture and to the scholars.

In 1 Corinthians 9:20 Paul writes, “To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews.” He goes on to elaborate on the idea that Christians must enter into solidarity with those they are trying to reach with the gospel. This concept is also seen in Jesus’ coming to earth, the primary inspiration for our role as missionaries, “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us…” (John 1:14). This idea has been elaborated on by scholars and given the title contextualization.[16] Good contextualization takes place when the universal truth of the Gospel is planted in a specific context and allowed to grow as a natural yet distinct part of that context. Individualistic worship is very much relevant to the context of American society, but is it compatible with the Gospel?

Jesus told a crowd of people, "if anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me” (Mark 8:33-35). He told the rich man to sell his possessions and give his money to the poor (Luke 18:22). He even told the scribes and Pharisees that the greatest commandment is to “love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength… love your neighbor as yourself.” (Mark 12:30-31). Later, Paul tells the Corinthians that they were “bought at a price” and are not their own (1 Cor. 6:19-20). He elaborates extensively on the idea that Christians are the body of Christ. “…we, though many, are one body in Christ, and individually members one of another.” (Romans 12:5). Lastly, the letters Paul wrote were addressed to communities, not to individuals.[17] The examples I have listed here are barely skimming the surface of all the Bible says that comes in contrast to individualism.

As mentioned before, the doctrine of the Trinity makes it difficult to maintain an individualistic worldview. In John 17:21, Jesus prays that, just as He is in the Father and the Father is in Him, we (Christians) may be one and that we may be in them (the Father and Son). This communion we are to have with each other and with the Trinity goes beyond just ourselves: “… so that the world may believe that you (the Father) have sent me.” And why did the Father send the Son? Because He so loved the world (John 3:16). The way we spread the Gospel in this world is by being intimately connected with God and with each other in love. It is therefore absurd to think that allowing individualism into our churches could simply be a good method of contextualization which will help us reach the lost. That leaves no room for the way we communicate the Gospel most effectively.

We must now look at the true form and function of corporate worship. One of the essential aspects is that God meets us when we gather together. Jesus said, “where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I among them.” (Mathew 18:20). David Peterson suggests that God uses us to express Himself to each other through edification. As we proclaim the word to each other, Christ makes His presence known and indwells peoples’ hearts. As we sing songs of praise and gratitude we are allowing the word of Christ to dwell in us richly (Colossians 3:16). Peters says, “any gospel-based ministry of encouragement or admonition will be a means by which Christ engages with his people.”[18]

The local congregation is also a temple for the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 3:16). This is true when the God’s people are off doing their own things, but it is especially significant when they gather together. According to Peterson, Paul argues in 1 Corinthians that quarrelling and division in the congregation is equivalent to destroying the temple of God. Being the temple of God, however, is more than just getting along with each other. We are to be set apart by living distinct lives from those around us. “we need to remember that we belong to the community called to reflect God’s character and purposes in the world and to the world.”[19] The temple isn’t just for God’s people, but ultimately it is for God to bless the whole world.

We’ve seen how individualism can be seen in the Church, how Scripture refutes that philosophy, and what the purpose of the corporate worship gathering is. Now the question is, how do we get the Church from where it is not, to where it should be? This task is daunting because we will be battling deeply engrained worldviews and values, but it must be done. A key part of the solution lies in the design of our corporate worship gatherings. As mentioned before, these gatherings are shaped by existing beliefs and it may seem like trying to change them is equivalent to stapling leaves to a piece of wood in the hopes that it will become a tree again. The other side of the coin is, however, that “how we worship shapes what we believe.”[20] Also, the weekly gathering of the Church gives shape to the way we live our lives throughout the rest of the week.[21]

This essay will not examine the specifics of how this re-shaping might look, but I do have a few thoughts about where we might start. As Christians, we are part of a long and vast tradition and can learn much from examining the ways the Church has done its corporate worship in the past, as well as the practices of other traditions today (such as the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches). A more in depth Biblical theology of corporate worship is another important starting point. Lastly, God has given us the gift of reason and I believe that experimentation and the messy process of trial and error can be extremely fruitful.

The pervasive individualistic mindset in North America has had a significant effect on the Church and her corporate worship gatherings. We see it in the way people decide to be part of a Church or not, in our soteriology, and in the songs we sing. The Bible presents us with a ideas that force us to re-think our cultural assumptions like individualism. It also has much to say about the significance of gathering together. There is an obvious disparity between the way the evangelical Church is and what it should be, but through intentional re-shaping of church worship practices the effects can be undone.


[1] Laura Mirakian, “A Biblical Response to Individualism in America” (Masters Degree Thesis, 1991), abstract

[2] Robert N. Bellah, Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life (New York: Harper & Row, 1985) 31

[3] Bellah, 36-37

[4] Mirakian, abstract

[5] Mirkiam, 4; Bellah, 334

[6] Bellah, 228

[7] Ibid, 231

[8] Angela Ashwin, “Spirituality and Corporate Worhsip: Separate Worlds or Vitally Connected?” Worship 75, no. 2: 107 (2001),

ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost (accessed December 9, 2011).

[9] Bellah, 233

[10] Ibid, 234

[11] Wayne H. Johnson, "Practicing theology on a Sunday morning: corporate worship as spiritual formation." Trinity Journal 31, no. 1: 34 (2010),

ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost(accessed December 9, 2011).,

[12] Skye Jethani, The Divine Commodity: Discovering A Faith Beyond Consumer Christianity (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2009), 126-127

[14] Michelle K. Baker-Wright, "Intimacy and Orthodoxy: evaluating existing paradigms of contemporary worship music." Missiology 35, no. 2: 172 (2007),

ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost (accessed December 9, 2011).

[16] David J. Hesselgrave, Communicating Christ Cross-Culturally: An Introduction to Missionary Communication (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1991), 131

[17] Tom Holland, "Individualism and the people of God," Evangel 23, no. 3: 86-91 (2005), Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost (accessed December 9, 2011).

[18] David Peterson, Engaging with God: A Biblical Theology of Worship (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1992), 198.

[19] Peterson, 202-203

[20] Kendall R. Hafermehl, “Enhancing a Theocentric Focus At The Alliance Church, Okotoks, Alberta,” (Kendall R. Hafermehl, 2009), 60.

[21] Bellah, 227